
Historically, this has been the primary source of contention in Oakmont. At one extreme, some Oakmont residents would prefer to have the board spend money only to fix existing facilities. On the other extreme, some Oakmont residents would like to see the community construct expensive new facilities. I believe both extremes are flawed and my position is more middle of the road.

In California HOAs, boards have significant ability to make things happen, but board action without appropriate communication is simply unacceptable. Most people in a senior community don't care much about political issues, but the ones who do deserve not just the truth, but to understand why decisions are being made.

Boards must open, as much as possible, their operations and deliberations to the community. Board decisions cannot come out of nowhere. They should be based on a set of principles known to the community and applied openly and consistently.
This leadership concept inverts the traditional business hierarchy by making leaders responsible for ensuring the success of those who work for them. With this philosophy, leaders communicate frequently with and listen intently to what those on the front lines believe will improve their ability to serve the community and then help them achieve those goals.

Oakmont is first and foremost a community of people. As part of my campaign, and certainly if I'm chosen to serve on your board, I will frequently encourage people to give each other the benefit of the doubt, refrain from judging others for actions they don't understand and to always be kind, be kind, be kind.